Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Vox Talent
This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:16, Jan 30, 2005 (UTC)
Non-notable press-hound talent agency. Only 855 hits, most generated by the company's press releases or their talent's sites. Niteowlneils 23:41, 24 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Delete: promo, nonnotable. Wile E. Heresiarch 04:42, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - note that this is connected to the Dan Sandor article, also on VfD. Average Earthman 10:32, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)
- Comment - I gathered much of this info from the Dan Sandor page, therefore I don't think I should vote on this, but my comment is that a nations (Canada) ONLY national non union agency should not be considered "non-notable" in my humble opinion, although I agree that it may be deemed to be of interest to a small group; mainly actors in Canada. My 2 cents worth. (I am a new user, so please forgive any tech. errors (I was already "dissed" once <wink>).
- Delete. Mikkalai 07:09, 28 Jan 2005 (UTC)
This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.