Jump to content

Talk:Ku Klux Klan

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Former featured articleKu Klux Klan is a former featured article. Please see the links under Article milestones below for its original nomination page (for older articles, check the nomination archive) and why it was removed.
Main Page trophyThis article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page as Today's featured article on June 22, 2006.
On this day... Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 13, 2005Peer reviewReviewed
August 26, 2005Featured article candidatePromoted
October 31, 2006Featured article reviewKept
May 9, 2008Featured article reviewDemoted
On this day... Facts from this article were featured on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "On this day..." column on December 24, 2004, December 24, 2005, December 24, 2006, December 24, 2007, December 24, 2009, December 24, 2012, and December 24, 2015.
Current status: Former featured article


Semi-protected edit request on 30 November 2024

[edit]

In the second paragraph it says that the Klan opposed Republican governed states, but Abraham Lincoln was a republican, and the segregationist's party at the time were Democrat aligned officials. It's blatant false, or reversed. 184.157.241.145 (talk) 02:26, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

 Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Cannolis (talk) 02:29, 30 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

They are not Christian.

[edit]

They are Neo-Pagan mostly who dress as wizards that burn crosses as a ritual specifically in spite of God. Why do they use racist symbols rooted in paganism? 2603:8080:D1F0:1AD0:9C28:F987:9D6F:96F3 (talk) 08:34, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1928 presidential election

[edit]

In the subsection Resistance and decline, why does it say:

"In the 1928 presidential election, the state voters overcame their initial opposition to the Catholic candidate Al Smith and voted the Democratic Party line as usual."?

There is not citation or explanation with this sentence. Al Smith lost the 1928 election by a landslide. States like Florida, Texas, Virginia, and North Carolina which typically went for the Democratic party in the early 20th c. (see Solid South) went Republican in 1928. The article on the 1928 presidential election says that anti-Catholic sentiment was a major factor in Smith's loss and includes several sources to support this. Unless someone has a source to back the claim that "voters overcame their initial opposition to the Catholic candidate Al Smith and voted the Democratic Party line as usual", I think it should be removed from the article. Wanderingspark (talk) 18:19, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]